Core services
Enterprise Data Extraction

Scalable web, app and AI-powered collection across 40+ countries.

All 58 services →
New 2026
AI Training Data

Corpus building with provenance and opt-out compliance.

Learn more →
Free pilot
24-hour sample

We run collection on your own sources before you commit.

Get a sample →
58Services
40+Countries
DEVELOPER

Ready-Made Scrapers

Pre-built for top platforms. Self-serve, no setup.

View All →
TRY FREE

API Playground

Test endpoints instantly. No credit card.

Start Free →
28Tools
2SDKs
icons Delivery & SDKs
Streaming Crawl API Scheduler Realtime Alerts Webhook Delivery 🐍 Python SDK 💚 Node.js SDK
Need it managed instead?

Fixed monthly retainer, named engineer, no per-request metering.

Managed Data API →
HOT

Case Studies

How brands use Actowiz, with named outcomes.

Read →
FREE

Sample Datasets

Real output, no signup.

Download →
NEW

ROI Calculator

Model the return on a data engagement.

Calculate →
Platform · Boliga

Boliga Data Scraping

Most property data ends at the asking price. Denmark is one of the few markets where you can see what happened next.

Boliga data scraping collects Danish property listings, asking prices, status and — unusually — transaction data that Denmark publishes more openly than most markets. That makes this one of the few places where the standard property-data caveat (an asking price is not a transaction price) can actually be tested rather than just stated.

Every other property page in this set says asking is not sold. This is the market where you can measure the gap.

Free pilot on your own Boliga list, returned in 24 hours. No card, no trial clock — and you keep the sample data either way.

boliga.jsonl LIVE FEED
{"portal":"boliga","listing_id":"bo-44120", "tenure_type":"owner_occupied", "asking_price":3450000,"asking_source":"listing", "asking_observed_at":"2026-04-11", "sold_price":3290000,"sold_source":"transaction_record", "sold_published_at":"2026-08-06", "asking_sold_link_confidence":0.94, "asking_to_sold_pct":-4.6} {"asking_sold_link_confidence":0.51, "asking_to_sold_pct":"null", "pct_null_reason":"link_confidence_below_threshold"} {"transaction_published_lag_days":117, "buyer_seller_identity":"not_collected", "caution":"a recent-period sold average is INCOMPLETE by construction. lag is 117 days"}
3 of 284,110 listing + transaction rows · Denmarktwo SOURCES, linked with confidence · lag recorded · schema v1.0

Independence and trademarks. Actowiz Solutions is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to Boliga or its owners. Boliga and related marks belong to their respective owners, used here only to name the publicly accessible source this service collects from.

Our Data Powers
B2C Marketplace
amazon
D2C + Marketplace
NYKAA
D2C + Marketplace
Walmart
FMCG Marketplace
udaan
Food Delivery
Uber Eats
Quick Commerce
blinkit
Taxi Aggregator
Uber
E-Commerce
Tmall
Boliga at a glance

How we handle Boliga specifically

Platform-specific handling, not a generic retail template pointed at a different domain.

Portal
Boliga — Denmark
What is unusual
Transaction data is publicly available in this market
So
Asking can be checked against sold
The two are still
Separate fields, separately sourced
Linking
A match with confidence, not an assumption
Timing
Transaction publication lags the sale. Lag recorded
Address
As published. Never sharpened
Refresh
Daily for listings; transaction data on its own cadence
Platform specifics

Two sources, one property, and the gap between them

These are the reasons a Boliga dataset needs its own handling rather than a shared retail schema.

Asking and sold are different sources and stay separate fields

Denmark's transparency makes something possible that most markets do not allow: comparing what was asked with what was paid.

But they remain two sources, and conflating them is the failure to avoid:

  • Asking price comes from a listing, published by an agent.
  • Transaction data comes from a registry process, on its own cadence.
  • They are published at different times, with the transaction lagging the sale.
  • Linking them is a match, not a fact — address, timing and attributes have to align.

So asking_price and sold_price are separate fields with separate source and timestamp, and asking_sold_link_confidence travels with any pairing.

asking_to_sold_pct is computed only where the link is high confidence, and is null with a reason otherwise. An unverified pairing would produce the most quotable and least reliable figure in the dataset.

And the lag is a field, not a nuisance

transaction_published_lag_days is recorded. A recent-period sold-price average is systematically incomplete because the most recent transactions have not been published yet — and that incompleteness gets mistaken for a market movement more often than almost anything else in property data.

Danish conventions, and what we do not collect

Property type conventions

Danish property categories — owner-occupied flats, houses, cooperative housing — have distinct legal and pricing characteristics. Cooperative housing in particular does not price like ownership, and pooling them produces an average across different products.

tenure_type is a dimension and we do not pool cooperative with owner-occupied in any default figure.

Area and price per square metre

Area basis recorded with every figure; price per square metre captured where displayed and computed alongside, with disagreement flagged.

Status

Transitions as timestamped events. Here a disappearance can sometimes be resolved against transaction data — but only where the link is high confidence, and otherwise disappearance_reason stays not_determined.

What we do not collect

  • Buyer or seller identities, even where a registry process makes some of it available. A transaction is a commercial event; the parties are people.
  • An asking-to-sold figure from a low-confidence link.
  • A recent-period average presented without its publication lag.
  • An address sharpened beyond publication.

The first is the one that matters most. Transparency about prices is not a licence to collect data about the people involved, and we do not.

Scope

What we collect on Boliga, and what we do not

The right column matters more than the left. Anyone can list fields; the limits are what tell you whether the dataset will hold up.

✅ What we collect

  • asking_price and sold_price as separate fields with separate sources and timestamps
  • asking_sold_link_confidence on any pairing
  • asking_to_sold_pct computed only on high-confidence links, null with a reason otherwise
  • transaction_published_lag_days recorded
  • A warning on any recent-period sold average about publication lag
  • tenure_type as a dimension, cooperative never pooled with owner-occupied
  • area_basis on every area figure
  • Status transitions as timestamped events
  • address_precision as published, never sharpened

❌ What we do not, and why

  • Asking and sold figures merged into one price column
  • An asking-to-sold percentage from a low-confidence link
  • A recent-period sold average presented without its lag
  • Cooperative housing pooled with owner-occupied in a default figure
  • Buyer or seller identities, in any form

Core Boliga fields

The full dictionary is agreed during scoping. These are the fields specific to this platform.

Field What it is on this platform
portal / listing_id / municipality The listing and where it is
tenure_type A dimension. Cooperative is not ownership
asking_price / asking_source / asking_observed_at One source, with its timestamp
sold_price / sold_source / sold_published_at Another source, with its timestamp
asking_sold_link_confidence A match, not a fact
asking_to_sold_pct / pct_null_reason Only on high-confidence links
transaction_published_lag_days Why a recent average is incomplete
area_sqm / area_basis / price_per_sqm With the basis
status / status_changed_at / disappearance_reason Events, and what we cannot know
address_precision As published. Never sharpened
observed_at Timestamp
Use cases

What teams do with Boliga data

Testing the asking-versus-sold gap

Two separately sourced fields with a link confidence, in one of the few markets where the standard property-data caveat can be measured rather than only stated.

Lag-aware market analysis

Publication lag recorded, so a recent-period sold average is read as systematically incomplete rather than as a market movement.

Tenure-correct pricing

Cooperative housing kept out of owner-occupied figures, since it does not price like ownership and pooling them averages different products.

Listing outcome analysis

Status transitions with disappearance resolved against transaction data only where the link is high confidence.

The 24-hour sample — run on your sources, not ours

Send us a Boliga item or category list. We run real collection against it and return the output within 24 hours, with the platform-specific fields populated so you can check them yourself rather than take our word for it.

  • Real extraction from your actual sources
  • Returned within 24 hours
  • Coverage and QA note included
  • You keep the data either way
  • No card, no trial clock
  • Named engineer on the call
Get my free sample Book a 20-min scoping call Reply within one business day. Reference calls available under NDA.
How we engage

Three ways to engage us

Same collection pipeline and QA underneath. The difference is who holds the schedule and how the data reaches you.

Managed service (most common)

We own the collection, the QA and the delivery. You receive clean data on a schedule and never touch a scraper.

  • Dedicated engineer assigned to your account
  • Site changes fixed by us, not reported to you
  • Scheduled delivery to your warehouse or S3
  • Named contact on Slack or email

Best fit: Teams who need the data, not the infrastructure.

API access

The same collection pipeline exposed as an authenticated REST endpoint your systems query directly.

  • On-demand and scheduled endpoints
  • Rate limits agreed to your load profile
  • Sandbox keys for integration testing
  • Versioned schema with deprecation notice

Best fit: Product and engineering teams building on live data.

One-time or project extraction

A defined pull for a specific question — market sizing, diligence, a pitch, a one-off audit.

  • Fixed scope agreed in writing upfront
  • Single delivery with full QA report
  • Methodology documented for your records
  • Converts to managed if you want continuity

Best fit: Research, strategy and diligence work with a deadline.

Pricing

Every engagement is quoted individually, because the honest answer depends on your scope: how many sources, how many records, how often, and how the data reaches you. We scope it with you, run a free pilot on your own sources, and then quote a fixed monthly figure — no per-request metering and no overage billing when volumes move. Request a quote and you will have a number after one call.

Boliga is usually collected alongside its competitors

Almost nobody buys a single platform in isolation. Boliga data becomes useful when it sits next to the competitor set on one schema, refreshed on one schedule, so a price index or availability comparison is genuinely like-for-like.

That is what real estate data covers, and a Boliga-only engagement can be expanded into it without rebuilding. If you already know you need several platforms, start there instead — it is the same pipeline and usually the better scoping conversation.

FAQ

Boliga data scraping: frequently asked questions

Platform-specific questions, including what cannot be collected here.

In this market, yes — Denmark publishes transaction data more openly than most. That is unusual, and it is why this page exists separately from the other property pages.

They remain two sources though: asking comes from a listing, sold from a registry process, published at different times.

It is a match rather than a fact, so a confidence value travels with every pairing. Address, timing and attributes have to align.

We compute an asking-to-sold percentage only on high-confidence links, because an unverified pairing would produce the most quotable and least reliable figure in the dataset.

Because a recent-period sold-price average is systematically incomplete — the most recent transactions have not been published yet.

That incompleteness gets mistaken for a market movement more often than almost anything else in property data, so we record the lag and warn on any recent-period average.

Because it does not price like ownership. Danish property categories have distinct legal and pricing characteristics, and pooling them produces an average across different products.

Tenure type is a dimension and we do not pool them in any default figure.

No, in any form. Transparency about prices is not a licence to collect data about the people involved.

A transaction is a commercial event; the parties are people, and we do not collect them anywhere.

We quote individually. Linking asking to sold adds cost beyond raw extraction, and it is what makes the dataset distinctive — so it is worth scoping deliberately rather than by default.

One scoping call, a free pilot within 24 hours including link confidence on your geography, then a fixed monthly quote. Request a quote.

See real Boliga data before you commit to anything

Send us an item or category list. We return the output within 24 hours with the platform-specific fields populated.

Free pilot, no card, no obligation. If we cannot collect a field you need on this platform, the sample shows you that too.

Social Proof That Converts

Trusted by Global Leaders Across Q-Commerce, Travel, Retail, and FoodTech

Our web scraping expertise is relied on by 4,000+ global enterprises including Zomato, Tata Consumer, Subway, and Expedia — helping them turn web data into growth.

4,000+ Enterprises Worldwide
50+ Countries Served
20+ Industries
Join 4,000+ companies growing with Actowiz →
Real Results from Real Clients

Hear It Directly from Our Clients

Watch how businesses like yours are using Actowiz data to drive growth.

▶
1 min
★★★★★
"Actowiz Solutions offered exceptional support with transparency and guidance throughout. Anna and Saga made the process easy for a non-technical user like me. Great service, fair pricing!"
TG
Thomas Galido
Co-Founder / Head of Product at Upright Data Inc.
▶
2 min
★★★★★
"Actowiz delivered impeccable results for our company. Their team ensured data accuracy and on-time delivery. The competitive intelligence completely transformed our pricing strategy."
II
Iulen Ibanez
CEO / Datacy.es
▶
1:30
★★★★★
"What impressed me most was the speed — we went from requirement to production data in under 48 hours. The API integration was seamless and the support team is always responsive."
FC
Febbin Chacko
-Fin, Small Business Owner
icons 4.8/5 Average Rating
icons 50+ Video Testimonials
icons 92% Client Retention
icons 50+ Countries Served

Join 4,000+ Companies Growing with Actowiz

From Zomato to Expedia — see why global leaders trust us with their data.

Why Global Leaders Trust Actowiz

Backed by automation, data volume, and enterprise-grade scale — we help businesses from startups to Fortune 500s extract competitive insights across the USA, UK, UAE, and beyond.

icons
7+
Years of Experience
Proven track record delivering enterprise-grade web scraping and data intelligence solutions.
icons
4,000+
Projects Delivered
Serving startups to Fortune 500 companies across 50+ countries worldwide.
icons
200+
In-House Experts
Dedicated engineers across scrapers, AI/ML models, APIs, and data quality assurance.
icons
9.2M
Automated Workflows
Running weekly across eCommerce, Quick Commerce, Travel, Real Estate, and Food industries.
icons
270+ TB
Data Transferred
Real-time and batch data scraping at massive scale, across industries globally.
icons
380M+
Pages Crawled Weekly
Scaled infrastructure for comprehensive global data coverage with 99% accuracy.

AI Solutions Engineered
for Your Needs

→
LLM-Powered Attribute Extraction: High-precision product matching using large language models for accurate data classification.
→
Advanced Computer Vision: Fine-grained object detection for precise product classification using text and image embeddings.
→
GPT-Based Analytics Layer: Natural language query-based reporting and visualization for business intelligence.
→
Human-in-the-Loop AI: Continuous feedback loop to improve AI model accuracy over time.
icons Product Matching icons Attribute Tagging icons Content Optimization icons Sentiment Analysis icons Prompt-Based Reporting

Connect the Dots Across
Your Retail Ecosystem

We partner with agencies, system integrators, and technology platforms to deliver end-to-end solutions across the retail and digital shelf ecosystem.

icons
Analytics Services
icons
Ad Tech
icons
Price Optimization
icons
Business Consulting
icons
System Integration
icons
Market Research
Become a Partner →

Popular Datasets — Ready to Download

Browse All Datasets →
icons
Amazon
eCommerce
Free 100 rows
icons
Zillow
Real Estate
Free 100 rows
icons
DoorDash
Food Delivery
Free 100 rows
icons
Walmart
Retail
Free 100 rows
icons
Booking.com
Travel
Free 100 rows
icons
Indeed
Jobs
Free 100 rows

Latest Insights & Resources

View All Resources →
thumb
Blog

How Food Aggregators API Integration 2026 Helps Restaurant Chains Unify Orders, Menus, and Pricing Data

Food Aggregators API Integration 2026 helps restaurant chains unify menus, orders, pricing, availability, and performance data across platforms.

thumb
Case Study

How We Helped a Beverage Brand Optimize Market Tracking with Twice-Weekly Liquor Data Collection from Vinovoss

Track liquor prices, products, availability, and market changes with Twice-Weekly Liquor Data Collection from Vinovoss for timely insights.

thumb
Report

Meesho Pincode-Level Product Data Report 2026

Explore Meesho Pincode-Level Product Data Report 2026 covering local pricing, product availability, SKU trends, and regional e-commerce intelligence.

Start Where It Makes Sense for You

Whether you're a startup or a Fortune 500 — we have the right plan for your data needs.

icons
Enterprise
Book a Strategy Call
Custom solutions, dedicated support, volume pricing for large-scale needs.
icons
Growing Brand
Get Free Sample Data
Try before you buy — 500 rows of real data, delivered in 2 hours. No strings.
icons
Just Exploring
View Plans & Pricing
Transparent plans from $500/mo. Find the right fit for your budget and scale.
Get in Touch
Let's Talk About
Your Data Needs
Tell us what data you need — we'll scope it for free and share a sample within hours.
  • icons
    Free Sample in 2 HoursShare your requirement, get 500 rows of real data — no commitment.
  • icons
    Plans from $500/monthFlexible pricing for startups, growing brands, and enterprises.
  • icons
    US-Based SupportOffices in New York & California. Aligned with your timezone.
  • icons
    ISO 9001 & 27001 CertifiedEnterprise-grade security and quality standards.
Request Free Sample Data
Fill the form below — our team will reach out within 2 hours.
+1 ▼
✓ Free 500-row sample · No credit card · Response within 2 hours

Request Free Sample Data

Our team will reach out within 2 hours with 500 rows of real data — no credit card required.

+1 ▼
✓ Free 500-row sample · No credit card · Response within 2 hours